TMRG 2011 Week 20

The increased number of competitors challenges my theme-width. If you click here, a larger image-version of the table will appear in a new window (you might want to try full-screen (F11) on that). The table for how the Indycar double-header scores were calculated is also below.

Below is this week’s average and efficiency table. Dividing the Total of points scored by all players by the number of Picks made by all players gives the Average scored for the picks of that event. The Maximum is reached by working out the perfect score for each player in that series, 50 for one pick, 90 for two picks, 125 for three, et cetera, and adding all these up. The Efficiency is what percentage the Total is of this Maximum.

  Total Picks Average  Maximum    Efficiency  
Le Mans  583 34 17·1 1404 41·5%
Formula 1  987 38 26·0 1573 62·7%
MotoGP  1050 32 32·8 1372 76·5%
Indycar  555 15 37·4 660 84·1%
NASCAR  183 11 16·6 495 37·0%
Total  3358 130 25·8 5504 61·0%

Had everyone chosen 2-2-2-2-2 splits, the maximum would have been 450*13 = 5850, of which 3358 is 57·4%.

Below are the accumulative tables. ‘Sportscars’ includes ALMS, LMS, ILMC and Le Mans (but not Daytona).

  Total Picks Average  Maximum    Efficiency  
MotoGP  10537 303 34·8 11899 88·6%
Formula 1  13788 414 33·3 15600 88·4%
Sportscars  5854 188 31·1 7641 76·6%
DTM  3422 112 30·6 4512 75·8%
Indycar  6878 249 27·6 9989 68·9%
NASCAR  11290 548 20·6 20988 53·8%

Below is shown how many points the winners have been getting and at their efficiencies. The efficiencies are the percentage of points the winner of that week got of the maximum points available.

In a one-event week, picking the top-seven would give 241 points. In a three-event week, picking the top-three for two events and the top-four for the other would give 407 points. Of course, only a 4-3-3 split would give that opportunity. For example, a 5-4-1 split could only ever garner up to 394 points (96·8%). No one this year (so far) or last year has ever achieved a maximum score, either for the best split or the split they chose.

(I am not looking to grade wins as winning is winning, with some weeks being more predictable than others.)

                
1    Sbun    1    224    241    93·0%    Daytona 24
4    James    1    134    241    55·6%    NC(p)
5    Jackie    1    211    241    61·4%    NC
6    SG    1    148    241    87·6%    NC
8    Ryan    3    359    407    88·2%    NC Moto ILMC
9    Sean    3    352    407    86·5%    NC IRL F1
10    Sean    3    311    407    76·4%    NC Moto(w) LMS
11    TCC    3    338    407    83·0%    NC IRL F1
12    Sean    4    356    430    82·8%    NC(p) IRL F1 ALMS
14    Sean    4    403    430    93·7%    NC IRL(w) Moto DTM
15    Felipe    3    370    407    90·9%    NC F1 ILMC
16    Pat W    3    333    407    81·8%    NC DTM Moto
17    Sebs    1    237    241    98·3%    F1
17    RGoat    1    237    241    98·3%    F1
18    SG    3    330    407    81·1%    NC F1 IRL
19    Sbun    3    339    407    83·3%    NC DTM Moto
20    Ryan    5    331    450    73·6%    NC LM Moto(w) F1(w) IRL

Apologies for truncating people’s names for width reasons. (w) signals a race for which I consider the result was significantly effected by rain. (p) marks a NASCAR restrictor-plate race.

I seem to have lost the option to disable comments. Would you please leave any feedback over on Patrick’s game-posts, as this is only intended as an extension of those.

Too Much Racing

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: