TMRG 2011 Week 16
The increased number of competitors challenges my theme-width. If you click here, a larger image-version of the table will appear in a new window (you might want to try full-screen (F11) on that).
Below is this week’s average and efficiency table. Dividing the Total of points scored by all players by the number of Picks made by all players gives the Average scored for the picks of that event. The Maximum is reached by working out the perfect score for each player in that series, 50 for one pick, 90 for two picks, 125 for three, et cetera, and adding all these up. The Efficiency is what percentage the Total is of this Maximum.
| Total | Picks | Average | Maximum | Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DTM | 1466 | 48 | 30·5 | 1878 | 78·1% |
| MotoGP | 2111 | 63 | 33·5 | 2406 | 87·7% |
| NASCAR | 694 | 29 | 23·9 | 1214 | 57·2% |
| Total | 4271 | 140 | 30·5 | 5498 | 77·7% |
Had everyone chosen 4-3-3 splits, the maximum would have been 407*14 = 5698, of which 4271 is 75·0%.
Below are the accumulative tables. ‘Sportscars’ includes ALMS, LMS, ILMC and Le Mans (but not Daytona). There have been eleven NASCAR races (three NASCAR-only weeks), four events for Indycar, sportscars, MotoGP, F1, and two for DTM.
| Total | Picks | Average | Maximum | Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Formula 1 | 7813 | 225 | 34·7 | 8662 | 90·2% |
| MotoGP | 7542 | 219 | 34·4 | 8523 | 88·5% |
| Sportscars | 5271 | 154 | 34·2 | 6237 | 84·5% |
| DTM | 2292 | 71 | 32·2 | 2890 | 79·3% |
| Indycar | 5343 | 184 | 29·0 | 7387 | 72·3% |
| NASCAR | 10346 | 500 | 20·7 | 18938 | 54·6% |
Below is shown how many points the winners have been getting and at their efficiencies. The efficiencies are the percentage of points the winner of that week got of the maximum points available.
In a one-event week, picking the top-seven would give 241 points. In a three-event week, picking the top-three for two events and the top-four for the other would give 407 points. Of course, only a 4-3-3 split would give that opportunity. For example, a 5-4-1 split could only ever garner up to 394 points (96·8%). No one this year (so far) or last year has ever achieved a maximum score, either for the best split or the split they chose.
(I am not looking to grade wins as winning is winning, with some weeks being more predictable than others.)
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 1 | Sbun | 1 | 224 | 241 | 93·0% | Daytona 24 |
| 4 | James | 1 | 134 | 241 | 55·6% | NC(p) |
| 5 | Jackie | 1 | 211 | 241 | 61·4% | NC |
| 6 | SG | 1 | 148 | 241 | 87·6% | NC |
| 8 | Ryan | 3 | 359 | 407 | 88·2% | NC Moto ILMC |
| 9 | Sean | 3 | 352 | 407 | 86·5% | NC IRL F1 |
| 10 | Sean | 3 | 311 | 407 | 76·4% | NC Moto(w) LMS |
| 11 | TCC | 3 | 338 | 407 | 83·0% | NC IRL F1 |
| 12 | Sean | 4 | 356 | 430 | 82·8% | NC(p) IRL F1 ALMS |
| 14 | Sean | 4 | 403 | 430 | 93·7% | NC IRL(w) Moto DTM |
| 15 | Felipe | 3 | 370 | 407 | 90·9% | NC F1 ILMC |
| 16 | Pat W | 3 | 333 | 407 | 81·8% | NC DTM Moto |
Apologies for truncating people’s names for width reasons. 
signals a race for which I consider the result was significantly effected by rain. (p) marks a NASCAR restrictor-plate race.
I seem to have lost the option to disable comments. Would you please leave any feedback over on Patrick’s game-posts, as this is only intended as an extension of those.
effjuan 
Leave a Reply